Russian formalism
A school of literary theory and
analysis that emerged in Russia around 1915, devoting itself to the study of
literariness, i.e. the sum of ‘devices’ that distinguish literary language from
ordinary language. In reaction against the vagueness of previous literary
theories, it attempted a scientific description of literature especially poetry
as a special use of language with observable features. This meant deliberately
disregarding the contents of literary works, and thus inviting strong
disapproval from Marxist critics, for whom formalism was a term of reproach.
With the consolidation of Stalin’s dictatorship around 1929, Formalism was
silenced as a heresy in the Soviet Union, and its centre of research migrated
to Prague in the 1930s. Along with ‘literariness’, the most important concept
of the school was that of defamiliarization: instead of seeing literature as a
‘reflection’ of the world, Victor Shklovsky and his Formalist followers saw it
as a linguistic dislocation. or a ‘making strange’. In the period of Czech
Formalism. Jan Mukarovsky further refined this notion in terms of
foregrounding. In their studies of narrative, the Formalists also clarified the
distinction between plot (sjazet) and story (fabula). Apart from Shklovsky and
his associate Boris Eikhenbaum, the most prominent of the Russian Formalists
was Roman Jakobson, who was active both in Moscow and in Prague before
introducing Formalist theories to the United States. A somewhat distinct
Russian group is the ‘Bakhtin school’ comprising Mikhail Bakhtin, Pavlev
Medvedev, and Valentin Voloshinov; these theorists combined elements of
Formalism and Marxism in their accounts of verbal multi-accentuality and of the
dialogic text. Rediscovered in the West in the 1960s, the work of the Russian
Formalists has had an important influence on structuralist theories of
literature, and on some of the more recent varieties of Marxist literary
criticism.
No comments:
Post a Comment